Bureau de change


A bureau de change (plural bureaux de change, both pronounced /ˌbjʊəroʊ də ˈʃɒ̃ʒ/) (British English) or currency exchange (plural currency exchanges)[1] (American English) is a business whose customers exchange one currency for another. Although originally French, the term bureau de change is widely used throughout Europe, and European travellers can usually easily identify these facilities when in other European countries. It is also common to find a sign saying "Exchange" or "Change." Since the adoption of the euro, many exchange offices incorporate its logotype prominently on their signage.

The term bureau de change is not used in the United States. It is not in major American dictionaries[2][3] and not even recognized by the search engines of major tourism websites, for example the website of the Port Authority of NY & NJ and the official New York State tourism website.[4] Instead, the terms used in the United States and in Canadian English are currency exchange and sometimes money exchange, sometimes with various additions such as foreign, desk, office, counter, service, etc., for example foreign currency exchange office.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Bureau de change


A bureau de change (plural bureaux de change, both pronounced /ˌbjʊəroʊ də ˈʃɒ̃ʒ/) (British English) or currency exchange (plural currency exchanges)[1] (American English) is a business whose customers exchange one currency for another. Although originally French, the term bureau de change is widely used throughout Europe, and European travellers can usually easily identify these facilities when in other European countries. It is also common to find a sign saying "Exchange" or "Change." Since the adoption of the euro, many exchange offices incorporate its logotype prominently on their signage.

The term bureau de change is not used in the United States. It is not in major American dictionaries[2][3] and not even recognized by the search engines of major tourism websites, for example the website of the Port Authority of NY & NJ and the official New York State tourism website.[4] Instead, the terms used in the United States and in Canadian English are currency exchange and sometimes money exchange, sometimes with various additions such as foreign, desk, office, counter, service, etc., for example foreign currency exchange office.

Read Users' Comments (0)

History and new developments

Since 1996, when retail forex trading was first introduced, several brokers who lacked the sufficient tools developed their own trading platforms tailored specifically to their needs. The 1st retail FX brokers were MG Forex, The Matchbook FX ECN, GFT, CMC Markets, Saxo Bank (then known as Midas)and a handful of others. Most except CMC, Saxo & Matchbook FX were based on the ACT forex trading technology & GUI. These platforms were good enough at the time but required constant investments in R&D and this development cost too much. This was the first wave.

The second wave was in the early 2000s: several software companies entered the retail forex trading market by launching their own versions of trading platforms. Typically these versions were cumbersome for both front-end users (retail traders) and back-end users (retail brokers) due to the misunderstanding of the developers about the forex market and also because of the insufficient programming tools/languages at the time. Simultaneously most of the retail brokers kept using and developing their own systems as they waited for better platforms which were yet to be developed.

There are currently few to no brokers which were part of the first wave trading systems. By now most of the first wave brokers have either vanished, merged or progressed to the second wave trading platforms – the most common example of which is Metaquotes.

It is only in the last couple of years that the advanced trading platforms started to emerge. These platforms put much stronger emphasis on the user interface (GUI) making it more accessible to the retail traders while making trading on it very simple and intuitive. Moreover a very strong emphasis was put on the back-end which allowed the retail brokers better control over their operations, better reporting and accurate system and ways to manage marketing campaigns. Gradually this wave is replacing the previous second wave with a major shift now to the friendlier and more intuitive systems of the third wave which according to Aite Group are necessary in order to maintain growth [3].

Nowadays, banks have also jumped on the retail forex trading platform bandwagon and have started offering those services to individual traders and money mangers, expanding the forex trading appeal. DBFX and Citibank are some of the banks that are currently offering this service.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Retail forex platform


Retail forex trading is a segment of the vast foreign exchange market. It has been speculated that it represents 5 percent of the whole forex market which amounts to $50-100 billion [1][2] in daily trading turnover. One thing is certain: The retail forex market is explosively growing and is increasingly becoming an powerful force in the broader FX marketplace. Due to the increasing tendency in the past years of the gradual shift from traditional intrabank 'paper' trading to the more advanced and accurate electronic trading, there has been spur in software development in this field. This change provided different types of trading platforms and tools intended for the use by banks, portfolio managers, retail brokers and retail traders.

One of the most important tools required to perform a forex transaction is the trading platform providing retail traders and brokers with accurate currency quotes.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Forex Bank

Forex AB is a Swedish financial services company. The company was started in 1927 as a currency exchange service for travellers, at the Central Station in Stockholm. The owner of Gyllenspet's Barber Shop, according to the legend, discovered that most of his customers were tourists in need of currency for their trips. The owner began keeping the major currencies on hand.

The company was subsequently acquired by Statens Järnvägar (now SJ AB), the Swedish State Railways, which expanded the operations until it was sold off to one of the managers, Rolf Friberg, in 1965. The company was the only one apart from the banks that was licensed to conduct currency exchange in Sweden.

The company, which is still wholly owned by the Friberg family, has expanded into Denmark, Finland, Norway and Iceland and has over 60 shops, usually located at train stations or airports. The decrease in the business brought on by introduction of the euro has made the company look for alternative sources of revenue, like applying for a banking licence and attempting to move into more regular transaction services, earlier handled by Svensk Kassaservice, a subsidiary of the state owned Swedish postal company, Posten.

Since 2003 Forex is a licensed bank.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Forex History

Currency swaps were originally conceived in the 1970s to circumvent foreign exchange controls in the United Kingdom. At that time, UK companies had to pay a premium to borrow in US Dollars. To avoid this, UK companies set up back-to-back loan agreements with US companies wishing to borrow Sterling.[4] While such restrictions on currency exchange have since become rare, savings are still available from back-to-back loans due to comparative advantage.

Cross-currency interest rate swaps were introduced by the World Bank in 1981 to obtain Swiss francs and German marks by exchanging cash flows with IBM. This deal was brokered by Salomon Brothers with a notional amount of $210 million dollars and a term of over ten years.[5]

During the global financial crisis of 2008, the currency swap transaction structure was used by the United States Federal Reserve System to establish central bank liquidity swaps. In these, the Federal Reserve and the central bank of a developed[6] or stable emerging[7] economy agree to exchange domestic currencies at the current prevailing market exchange rate & agree to reverse the swap at the same exchange rate at a fixed future date. The aim of central bank liquidity swaps is "to provide liquidity in U.S. dollars to overseas markets."[8] While central bank liquidity swaps and currency swaps are structurally the same, currency swaps are commercial transactions driven by comparative advantage, while central bank liquidity swaps are emergency loans of US Dollars to overseas markets, and it is currently unknown whether or not they will be beneficial for the Dollar or the US in the long-term.[9]

The People's Republic of China has multiple year currency swap agreements of the Renminbi with Argentina, Belarus, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, and South Korea that perform a similar function to central bank liquidity swaps.[10]

Read Users' Comments (0)

Forex Structure

Currency swaps are over-the-counter derivatives, and are closely related to interest rate swaps. However, unlike interest rate swaps, currency swaps can involve the exchange of the principal.[1]

There are three different ways in which currency swaps can exchange loans:

The most simple currency swap structure is to exchange the principal only with the counterparty, at a rate agreed now, at some specified point in the future. Such an agreement performs a function equivalent to a forward contract or futures. The cost of finding a counterparty (either directly or through an intermediary), and drawing up an agreement with them, makes swaps more expensive than alternative derivatives (and thus rarely used) as a method to fix shorter term forward exchange rates. However for the longer term future, commonly up to 10 years, where spreads are wider for alternative derivatives, principal-only currency swaps are often used as a cost-effective way to fix forward rates. This type of currency swap is also known as an FX-swap.[2]

Another currency swap structure is to combine the exchange of loan principal, as above, with an interest rate swap. In such a swap, interest cash flows are not netted before they are paid to the counterparty (as they would be in a vanilla interest rate swap) because they are denominated in different currencies. As each party effectively borrows on the other's behalf, this type of swap is also known as a back-to-back loan.[2]

Last here, but certainly not least important, is to swap only interest payment cash flows on loans of the same size and term. Again, as this is a currency swap, the exchanged cash flows are in different denominations and so are not netted. An example of such a swap is the exchange of fixed-rate US Dollar interest payments for floating-rate interest payments in Euro. This type of swap is also known as a cross-currency interest rate swap, or cross-currency swap.[3]

Read Users' Comments (0)

Currency Swap


A currency swap is a foreign-exchange agreement between two parties to exchange aspects (namely the principal and/or interest payments) of a loan in one currency for equivalent aspects of an equal in net present value loan in another currency; see Foreign exchange derivative. Currency swaps are motivated by comparative advantage.[1] A currency swap should be distinguished from a central bank liquidity swap.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Pricing


F = s \left( \frac{1+r_1}{1+r_2}\right)^TAdd Image

where:

The forward points or swap points are quoted as the difference between forward and spot, F - S, and is expressed as the following:

F - S = S \left[ \left(\frac{1+r_1}{1+r_2}\right)^T -1 \right] \approx S \left( e^\left(\left(r_1 - r_2\right)T\right) - 1\right)

where r1 and r2 are small. Thus, the absolute value of the swap points increases when the interest rate differential gets larger, and vice versa.


Read Users' Comments (0)

Forex swap

A forex swap consists of two legs:

  • a spot foreign exchange transaction, and
  • a forward foreign exchange transaction.

These two legs are executed simultaneously for the same quantity, and therefore offset each other.

It is also common to trade forward-forward, where both transactions are for (different) forward dates.

By far and away the most common use of FX swaps is for institutions to fund their foreign exchange balances.

Once a foreign exchange transaction settles, the holder is left with a positive (or long) position in one currency, and a negative (or short) position in another. In order to collect or pay any overnight interest due on these foreign balances, at the end of every day institutions will close out any foreign balances and re-institute them for the following day. To do this they typically use tom-next swaps, buying (selling) a foreign amount settling tomorrow, and selling (buying) it back settling the day after.

The interest collected or paid every night is referred to as the cost of carry. As currency traders know roughly how much holding a currency position will make or cost on a daily basis, specific trades are put on based on this; these are referred to as carry tra

Read Users' Comments (0)

What are the Cultural Differences between the SME and a Large Enterprise

An SME is not big, mature, resource-rich, capital-comfortable, or very knowledgeable about what CRM system it wants. Vendors identify the mid-market range from a low end of $50 million to a high end of $1 billion (USD). Individuals have multiple roles in an SME and their business processes are underdeveloped, with best practices often nonexistent. They view CRM as modular versus enterprise-wide and their CRM implementation should be accelerated and at a fixed price.

Some exceptions however exist within this business space for companies that have implemented best practices and incrementally have improved demarcation of job descriptions. The largest vendors address this space more effectively than they do the typical SME space, but they still do not have a clear understanding of the difference between these organizations and large enterprises. The processes embedded in good SME CRM software applications have to be flexible enough to recognize constantly shifting roles and responsibilities. Often to be able to use CRM functionalities, mid-sized companies have to shift how they do business.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Product Definition and Market Impact

Today's small and mid-sized companies all have something in common. They are running on tight budgets while still sharing some of the bigger players' primary needs. The primary needs:

* Empowering their sales forces and customer service teams to better communicate with customers
* Allowing front-office employees to better perform collaborative work, thus enhancing team-selling opportunities
* Delivering information where it is needed and when it is needed
* Increasing efficiency and productivity while still being able to reduce costs

The SME market diverges from the larger-sized arena particularly in its lack of ability to sustain application or integration complexity and overdue return on investment (ROI). In other words, these companies need affordability, predictability, simplicity and instant value, along with a comprehensive application. The SME market diverges from the large enterprise not only from a functional standpoint but also in the way it adopts and implements technology. The formula is complex but it characterizes what is considered as today's market potential.

As the demand for small and medium-sized enterprises grows and outshines the large implementations, the market gets crowded with SME application providers. The SME market potential has CRM vendors and integrators of all sizes and shapes drooling. The market is growing at the rate of 13 percent per year, which is considerably faster than large enterprise growth.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Welcome to the CRM Mid-Market Abyss-PeopleSoft

TEC reviewed the PeopleSoft Preconfigured Mid-Market Solutions because it has taken an important share in PeopleSoft's overall customer base. With over 1,100 customers from the small and medium enterprise (SME) market, The Pleasanton, California, PeopleSoft (NASDAQ: PSFT), not only establishes its market dominance along with Siebel (NASDAQ: SEBL) and SAP (NASDAQ: SAP) as an enterprise solution provider, but also demonstrates its capability to cater to the mid-sized space and step on the traditional SME vendors' toes. PeopleSoft's strategy in tapping into the potential of the mid-market is based on targeting its Preconfigured Mid-Market Solution to the upper layer of the market. In a recent interview, PeopleSoft mid-market vice president and general manager, Jeffrey Read, defined the mid-market "as a tale of two markets: companies with simple business requirements and companies with sophisticated business requirements."

Like large enterprises, sophisticated SMEs have similar requirements with regards to functionality, business processes workflow, and integration. The principal difference comes from size. PeopleSoft is strongly aiming at this portion of the market by offering a preconfigured application with a data model, which maps out the special needs of the SME niche market place.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Back to Apama (not Panama or Obama, Bozo!)

Progress Apama became part of Progress Software via the acquisition of the former Apama LTD in April of 2005. Apama is the core technology foundation for Progress’ initiatives in CEP and the company’s go-to-market initiatives that leverage that CEP platform in capital markets for the following “daily bread” actions: algorithmic trading, market aggregation, real-time pricing, smart order routing, and market surveillance.

Prior to its acquisition by Progress Software, Apama had a few dozen customers in London, New York, and Boston. Today, however, after leveraging the global parent’s infrastructure, Apama is marketed and sold in all the major financial centers in the world.

Apama was founded in 1999 in Cambridge (UK), by John Bates and Giles Nelson. Fellow Cantabrigians and CEP visionaries Bates and Nelson are co-holders of the patents on Apama’s core technology, which is a commercially-productized expression of their efforts to create a platform for the unique characteristics of “event-based” applications.

Originally, Apama had set out to try and resolve a number of telecommunications-based real-time mobility issues, but had then realized that there were additional commercial opportunities in a wide range of environments. As a result, the company has historically focused on financial markets and specifically financial trading systems where real-time event-based trading systems are in high demand.

The capital markets segment has indeed proven to be an early proof point for the Apama CEP platform. Apama’s design philosophy and architecture were intended to provide a platform that allows traders to quickly develop and deploy distinctive proprietary strategies that exploit these opportunities and mitigate risks.

In addition to the above-mentioned CEP applications in capital markets, other current (or future) uses in the segment are the following: commodities trading, bonds trading and pricing, foreign exchange (Forex) aggregation and algorithms, futures exchange and options algorithms, equities trading, cross-asset trading, real-time risk management, broker algorithms, news-driven algorithms, and so on.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Principles of CEP-based Systems

In plain English, CEP lands itself well to any environment that treats any business update as an “event.” Such organizations want to enable users to rapidly define event-based business rules to identify patterns indicating opportunities and threats to the business. These encapsulated rules (either as “if-then” statements or structural query language [SQL] statements) are loaded into a real-time computing (RTC) CEP engine.

The correlating engine is permanently connected to multiple event sources and destinations (with volumes of events and related data points) and offers analysis and response within an extremely low latency period. Events can be captured and preserved in time-order for a historical pattern analysis and root-cause analysis (RCA).

Given that algorithmic trading in capital markets was one of the first real-life applications of CEP, let’s translate the above general CEP principles into trading terms. The continuing digitization of financial market data and the advancement of electronic market access has created a market environment in which competitive differentiation amongst financial service firms rests with split-second algorithmic execution that can exploit minuscule and momentary advantages in price, time, and available liquidity.

To that end, a trading company will treat any market update as an “event” and will enable users to rapidly build quantitative algorithms (based on their vast experience and know-how) to identify trading opportunities and risk breaches. Germane trading rules are then loaded into a trading system that offers real-time analysis and response with a latency measured in milliseconds.

The trading system is permanently connected to a number of relevant market data sources, news-feeds, and trading venues (exchanges). Finally, events can be captured and preserved in time-order for backtesting and digital forensics analysis.

In summary, the drivers for CEP adoption are the following:

* Applications with high throughput and latency requirements. Such requirements from market trends such as higher velocity business event flows, more voluminous (and yet shorter-lived) transactions, and rapidly changing market conditions. These trends in turn pose the challenges onto customers in terms of how to detect opportunities and threats in real-time, and how to show the health of their business; and
* The need for rapid software development and customization, and increasing application complexity (temporal and/or spatial logic, real-time analytics, etc.). The customers’ challenge in this regard is how to accelerate the deployment of new capabilities.

Read Users' Comments (0)

Processing Complex Events (During these, oh well, Complex Times) – Part I

The worn-out saying about how we learn new things every day applies to this blog topic too. Namely, my interest in Progress Software Corporation has long been due to its renowned OpenEdge development platform. Indeed, many enterprise resource planning (ERP) and other applications providers leverage (embed) OpenEdge as Progress Software partners. Sure, I also follow and have recently written about the company’s forays in the service-oriented architecture (SOA) space with its two respective offerings: Actional for web services management and Sonic for enterprise service bus (ESB) and messaging.

But in late 2007, out of mere courtesy, I accepted a briefing about Progress Apama, the company’s platform for complex event processing (CEP), algorithmic trading, and whatnot. Given the overwhelming nature (“rocket science” of a sort) of the offering’s concept, I now admit that I could not wait for the briefing to end.

Actually, I felt bamboozled like those ordinary mortal FBI agents in CBS’ primetime hit show “Numb3rs.” In that show, time and again the whiz kid math genius (the brother of the FBI team leader) tries to explain to these action-rather-than-theory agents how some complex and arcane math theory can be applied to make sense out of seemingly chaotic and unrelated events. Eventually, complex math solves some important crimes, often by detecting patterns that are not obvious to the naked eye.

Well, fast forward to early 2009, where at Progress’ Analyst Summit (a traditional Boston winter fixture event) we could all find out that Progress Apama is possibly the best performing and growing part of the company. OpenEdge, while still contributing to over 60 percent to Progress’ total revenues, is a mature business that is now sold mostly to independent software vendors (ISVs). In addition, the recent financial markets (and consequently the overall economic) crisis and related cases of high-profile frauds (”white-collar crimes”) have made me conduct my own study of Apama and become familiar with its underlying concept.

Frankly, I no longer grapple as much with the concept of CEP per se (Progress Software refers to CEP as “The Brains of the High Velocity Business”). Where I still get lost though is when it comes to CEP’s relationships with other like technologies and concepts “du jour.”

Read Users' Comments (0)